Beyond the Numbers: Why Evaluating a Goalie Based Only on Shots Faced is Limiting

In the hockey world, goalie statistics are often reduced to seemingly simple numbers: saves made, goals allowed, save percentage. But this superficial view can be not only limiting, but actually misleading when it comes to truly evaluating a netminder's performance.

The Myth of "Shots Faced"

When we hear "the goalie stopped 25 shots out of 27," our mind immediately processes a percentage: 92.6% saves. It seems like objective, mathematical, indisputable data. But does this statistic really tell the whole story?

The reality is much more complex.

A goalie can face 30 shots in a game and appear "busy," while in reality facing only long-distance shots, without pressure, with clear sight lines. Conversely, another goalie might face only 15 shots but all from high-danger situations: breakaways, one-timers from the slot, close-range deflections.

The Limitations of Traditional Statistics

1. They Don't Consider Shot Quality

• Is a 20-meter shot without pressure worth the same as a one-timer from 3 meters?

• Is a shot with clear visibility comparable to a deflection in traffic?

• Does a power play shot have the same difficulty as one at even strength?

• 
  

2. They Ignore Game Context

• Quality of defense in front of the goalie

• Special situations (power play, penalty kill)

• Game moment (psychological pressure)

• Ice conditions and visibility

• 
  

3. They Don't Measure Preventive Impact

• Communication with defense

• Puck handling behind the net

• Positioning that discourages certain shots

• Mental presence that influences attackers

A More Complete Evaluation: The P35 Method

In our holistic approach to goalie evaluation, we consider several factors:

Qualitative Shot Analysis

• Shooting zone: slot, perimeter, corners

• Shot type: wrist shot, slap shot, deflection, breakaway

• Time pressure: shot in motion, from a standstill, under pressure

• Visibility: clean shot, screened, in traffic

• 
  

Advanced Metrics

• Expected Goals Against (xGA): How many goals "should" have been allowed based on shot quality

• Goals Saved Above Expected (GSAE): Difference between expected goals and actual goals allowed

• High Danger Save Percentage: Save percentage on high-danger shots

• Rebound Control Rate: Ability to control rebounds

• 
  

Contextual Factors

• Defensive support: Quality of clears, slot coverage

• Team discipline: Penalties taken and special situations

• Game momentum: Performance in crucial moments

• Playing conditions: Ice, lighting, crowd noise

• Chances Grade

• 
  

Practical Examples: When Numbers Deceive

Case A: The "Busy Goalie"

• 35 shots faced, 32 saves (91.4%)

• But: 25 shots from beyond 15 meters, no one-timers, only 3 shots from the slot

• Reality: Relatively easy game, effective defense

• 
  

Case B: The "Less Busy Goalie"

• 18 shots faced, 16 saves (88.9%)

• But: 12 shots from the slot, 6 one-timers, 4 breakaways

• Reality: Exceptional performance under difficult conditions

Who played better? Traditional statistics would say Case A, but qualitative analysis reveals a completely different story.

Implications for Coaches and Players

For Coaches:

• Don't base decisions only on raw numbers

• Develop a multidimensional evaluation system

• Clearly communicate evaluation criteria to players

• Use video analysis as a primary tool

  
  

For Goalies:

• Don't obsess over save percentage alone

• Focus on process, not just results

• Develop situational awareness

• Work on all aspects of the game, not just spectacular saves

  
  

For Parents:

• Understand that statistics tell only part of the story

• Support long-term development, not just immediate results

• Trust the judgment of qualified coaches

• Encourage critical analysis, not just celebration of numbers

  
  

Toward a Culture of Complete Evaluation

The future of goalie evaluation lies in integrating:

• Advanced quantitative data

• Detailed qualitative analysis

• Situational context

• Long-term development

  
  

Only this way can we truly understand and develop each goalie's potential, going beyond the surface of numbers to touch the essence of this complex and fascinating role.

Conclusion

Statistics are a tool, not absolute truth. A goalie who faces few shots might be supported by excellent defense, while one who faces many might be the victim of a poor defensive system.

True goalie evaluation requires an expert eye, contextual analysis, and deep understanding of the game. Only this way can we do justice to the complexity and beauty of this unique role in hockey.

Wait for next week article where we explain how we rate and evaluate a game for a goalie.

Remember: ALL WE CARE IS YOUR PASSION! And passion feeds on deep understanding, not superficial numbers.